What still needs judgment
This comparison checks the citation at its original position. It does not relocate a moved passage or decide whether a finding remains valid. The reviewer considers the changed source and its context.
47NETWORK / PYLOTHEKE EXAMPLE
A changed file.
An unchanged passage.
A source can change without changing the passage you cited. This saved Pylotheke example shows the difference—and why the finding still needs a review.
Fictional example · Harbor Notes · reading guide to the saved report
Three readings. One useful distinction.
In this example, a comment changed outside the cited passage. The report separates the change to the whole file from the text at the citation’s original position.
- The selected file
- Changed
- The file is different from the saved version.
- The cited passage
- Unchanged
- The same bytes remain at the original citation position.
- Where the change occurred
- Outside the cited passage
- The report records a change elsewhere in the file.
What this tells the reviewer
The original passage is still there. That is useful evidence for a review, but it does not establish that the finding is still correct or that the rest of the source is unaffected.
Keep a correction connected to its source
The accompanying walkthrough starts with an intentionally mistaken finding and records its correction. Both versions remain available to inspect alongside the selected source.
Inspect the saved report
The original screenshot is in English. The three readings above explain the comparison it shows; they are not a transcript of the entire report.
Review sources for a real question
Explore Pylotheke’s intended workflow, compare the listed source-review services, or tell us about the material you need to examine.
Pylotheke is in development and is not available for public use or download. This is a saved example, not an interactive product demo.
Back to Engineering